Subject: Re: rob_p1 And Ben_P1
From: Rob Anderson (rob@reawebtech.com)
Date: Fri Oct 04 2002 - 12:08:23 PDT
Another thing, what about the bit_vector versions?
I think we may be moving toward a decision:
1) get 1164 to cover bit_vectors
2) get rid of numeric_bit
--Rob
VhdlCohen@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 10/4/02 10:53:08 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> rob@reawebtech.com writes:
>
> <Rob_P1>
> I propose that we move the following match functions
> based on std_ulogic, std_logic_vector, std_ulogic_vector
> to std_logic_1164 (which is also open for modification
> right now).
>
>
>
> Is there any reason as to why we can't also move the contents of package
> reduce_Pack to
> std_logic_1164? After alll the std_logic_1164 has all the AND, OR, XOR
> functions, and the reduce operators really belong thee.
> I propose that we move the contents of package reduce_Pack to
> std_logic_1164.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ben Cohen Publisher, Trainer, Consultant (310) 721-4830
> http://www.vhdlcohen.com/ vhdlcohen@aol.com
> Author of following textbooks:
> * Real Chip Design and Verification Using Verilog and VHDL, 2002 isbn
> 0-9705394-2-8
> * Component Design by Example ", 2001 isbn 0-9705394-0-1
> * VHDL Coding Styles and Methodologies, 2nd Edition, 1999 isbn 0-7923-8474-1
> * VHDL Answers to Frequently Asked Questions, 2nd Edition, isbn 0-7923-8115
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Oct 04 2002 - 12:07:27 PDT