Re: std_logic_1164: CP-010 and numeric_std:Rob_P1


Subject: Re: std_logic_1164: CP-010 and numeric_std:Rob_P1
From: Paul J. Menchini (mench@mench.com)
Date: Wed Dec 11 2002 - 07:54:25 PST


Rob,

> To summarize,

> The current thinking is that we should have "match" in 1164, and 1) an
> alias for "std_match" in 1076.3 (legacy) and 2) DAVE_P2: new "match"
> functions in 1076.3 to inherit the one in 1164:

> 1) In numeric_std, replace the std_match function with:

> alias std_match is ieee.std_logic_1164.match
> [ieee.std_logic_1164.std_logic_vector,
> ieee.std_logic_1164.std_logic_vector
> return ieee.std_logic_1164.std_logic_vector];
> (is this correct?)

> 2) Dave_p2: add new functions in numeric_std, E.G.:

> function MATCH (L, R: UNSIGNED) return BOOLEAN;
> return match(std_logic_vector(L),std_logic_vector(R));
> ...

> Perhaps Paul could write up proposal 1 as paul_p1? You could use me as
> a second. (I think the second should appear in the proposal too, the
> proposals should not be there without seconds).

I'd be happy to, but what's necessary beyond what's stated?

Paul



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Dec 11 2002 - 07:58:18 PST