Subject: Accellera FV: Motion 2 -- Requirements
From: Yaron Wolfsthal (WOLFSTAL@il.ibm.com)
Date: Tue Aug 07 2001 - 09:12:25 PDT
I vote YES for Motion 2,
with the exception that the following requirements be further discussed:
46, 48 - template-oriented features, I believe should be handled out of the
FV language.
63, 68 - A/G stuff inconsistent with widespread practice.
- Yaron
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Aug 07 2001 - 09:11:21 PDT