| Id | Category | Summary | Resolution | Duplicate ID | Sv* Vote | SV* comment | Ch Recc | Ch Vote | Ch comment |
| 714 | SV-EC | Incorrect cross select expressions example | fixed | 0 | U | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 703 | SV-EC | Incorrect syntax given in P1800 Clause 13.5.2 | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | SV-CC to review | |
| 729 | SV-EC | Generate should be allowed in programs | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | SV-CC to review | |
| 720 | SV-EC | Change needed in coverpoint syntax to support open ranges | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 715 | SV-EC | Clarifications in functional coverage examples | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 724 | SV-EC | Incorrect transition bin example and synt | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 725 | SV-EC | Matching of class specializations | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 171 | SV-EC | Configuration of programs | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 248 | SV-EC | Missing ';' in clocking_drive defi | not a bug | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 384 | SV-EC | mailbox type compatibility | duplicate | 514 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 246 | SV-EC | Random object stability example code | not a bug | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 344 | SV-EC | The semantics of an anonymous program is not defined anywhere (19.2) | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Friendly amendment to change "procedures" to "tasks and functions" in changes 17.1 and 17.6 | Unanimous | Karen to forward to EC to see if anyone objects | |
| 340 | SV-EC | duplicate | 523 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | |||
| 730 | SV-EC | Return type of getc() is byte | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 512 | SV-EC | section 12.25 bullet 2) | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 532 | SV-EC | A.2.1.3 - BNF for data_declaration is not consistent with 6.2 | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 523 | SV-EC | undefined queue_type in prototypes pop_front and pop_back | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 680 | V-1364 | BTF-350 & 99: Proposal to deprecate configs in Verilog source files | None | 0 | None | No action Champions can take | |||
| 340 | SV-EC | More problems in queue method prototypes | duplicate | 523 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 687 | V-1364 | compatability pragma - was BTF 287 | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval, letting editor choose the correct version | Unanimous | ||
| 669 | V-1364 | Participant lists for Introduction | fixed | 0 | Not Required | To V-LRM w/o vote | Karen to update | ||
| 319 | SV-EC | what is the root thread? this term is not defined but used | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 317 | SV-EC | class as a bit-stream type | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 708 | SV-EC | Scheduling semantics PLI region feedback loop missing (549, 1.2) | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | SV-CC to review | |
| 722 | SV-EC | Re-inactive region | fixed | 0 | 6:yes, 1:abs, 2 No | Abstain:
Cliff 1. gut feeling is the proposal is good 2. a semi-complex late-stage change 3. may diminish consensus Opposed: Dave - not enough time to review internally Francoise - against re-inactive region, and also wants to get rid of the inactive region as well. |
Approval: Brad, Neil, Bassam, Surrendra; Return to the SV-EC: Francoise, Dave, Stu, Tom | Francoise believes that this is a big change in the central piece of the simulation algorithm, and we do not have enough time to evaluate if this will resolve issues or add more. We should not be adding time cues to solve testbench/design interactions. There is not enough time to resolve it. Dave believes that since the ballot comment was removed, the change should be removed. Brad and Neil believe that these are real issues that must be resolved, and that this is a good way to resolve them. Stu is concerned that there is not enough concensus. | |
| 713 | SV-EC | #0 and the inactive region (549, 4.1) | fixed | 0 | 1:abs | one abstain by Francoise because not expert on this topic | Approval | Unanimous | |
| 712 | SV-EC | cbAtEndOfSimTime definition incorrect (549, 2.4) | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | SV-CC to review | |
| 711 | SV-EC | postponed region definition (549, 2.3) | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | SV-CC to review | |
| 707 | SV-EC | scheduling algorithm is incorrect preponed preactive (549, 1.1) | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 709 | SV-EC | Preponed region definition (549, 2.1) | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | SV-CC to review | |
| 710 | SV-EC | observed region defintion (549, 2.1) | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | SV-CC to review | |
| 370 | SV-EC | what is the seed of top level threads in the case of hierarchical seeding | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 607 | SV-EC | 4.3.3 Accessing values of clocking variables | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 536 | SV-CC | Annex E.6.2 - packed struct and union types with DPI | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 441 | SV-CC | Annex I - Assertion #defines overlaps with object types | not a bug | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 416 | V-PTF | 27 - Need to not use the ambiguous term 'user' | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 487 | SV-CC | 32.34 Order of operands should be in 32.39 | duplicate | 686 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 455 | SV-CC | 32.12.1 poorly written paragraphs | duplicate | 489 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 437 | SV-CC | 30.4.4 Last paragraph does not make sense | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 376 | V-PTF | 26.6.6 Need to remove multiple labels on a one arrow | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 377 | SV-CC | "32.25 Module path, path term" does not reflect all the changes made in P1364 | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 451 | SV-CC | 32.5 Why the need for an interface tf decl? | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Should be not-a-bug | Unanimous | Karen to ask Charles why this is fixed | |
| 547 | SV-CC | 32.47 two tagged pattern objects in pattern class | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 528 | SV-CC | 32.21 missing iteration on type declarations | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 658 | V-1364 | Fix NOTE references | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 705 | V-1364 | Was ETF 659 - fullskew | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 688 | V-1364 | ETF618: $timeskew/$fullskew issues | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 723 | SV-CC | Fixing "user-defined system task or function" terminology | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | Affects both LRMs | |
| 539 | V-PTF | 26.1 use of 'user' | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 541 | V-PTF | 26.2.1 Several uses of the term 'user' | duplicate | 539 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 465 | SV-CC | 32.19 Please clarify vpiWaitingProcesses iteration | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 489 | SV-CC | 32.38 Need better definition of a ref obj object. | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 650 | SV-CC | Program and interface access to initial, always and final blocks is not supported | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 595 | SV-EC | 16.4 Invalid example | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 431 | SV-CC | 29.5 pollutes the VPI name space | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 501 | SV-BC | section 22.1 | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 499 | SV-BC | rule 7 section 6.9.2 could be written in a simple way | fixed | 0 | 1:abs | The abstention was by Cliff who felt he needed more time to digest the proposal. | Approval | Unanimous | |
| 493 | SV-BC | definition of the scope of a type in section 6.9 | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 689 | SV-BC | Add word 'additional' for clarity -- ballot issue 287 | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 514 | SV-EC | mailbox type mismatch | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 409 | SV-EC | Operations allowed on ref arguments not specified | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous |