| Id | Ballot issu | Category | Title | Resolution | Duplicate I | Sv* vote | * Comment | Champions | Vote | Ch Comment |
| 297 | ?? | SV-CC | Need to replace all occurences of IEEE 1364-2001 with new standard version name | not a bug | 0 | ?? | Approval | Unanimous | Editor to implement changes. | |
| 337 | ?? | SV-CC | Informative table on VPI sections not up-to-date | not a bug | 0 | ?? | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 338 | ?? | SV-CC | 31.22 missing from Table of Contents | not a bug | 0 | ?? | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 379 | 1364-?? | V-PTF | 27. VPI Routine Definitions - section describing optional arguments | not a bug | 0 | ?? | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 448 | 58 | SV-CC | 32.8 First note is not necessary and is incorrect | duplicate | 452 | ?? | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 660 | ?? | V-1364 | Change 20.1 to normative | fixed | 0 | ?? | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 534 | 107 | SV-CC | 32.26 vpiInterfaceTask and vpiInterfaceFunction properties | fixed | 0 | 1 abs | Francoise abstains, cannot remember why it was added, and Tapati might remember, if given the chance | Approval | Unanimous | |
| 382 | 73 | SV-CC | 32.13 vpiMember rather than vpiMembers in object model for nets | fixed | 0 | 1:abs | Stu abstained due to not completely understanding the issue | Approval | Unanimous | |
| 554 | 163 | SV-EC | Definition of program variable | 1-Abs | One abstention for lack of time to adequately study proposal | Approval | Unanimous | Neil says it's ok now | ||
| 641 | 255 | SV-EC | Remove cross_auto_bin_max | 1-Abs | One abstention for lack of time to adequately study proposal | Approval | Unanimous | Neil says it's ok now | ||
| 628 | 269 | SV-BC | Dimensions of the result of a width cast | fixed | 0 | 1-Abs | One abstention for lack of time to adequately study proposal | Approval | Unanimous | |
| 634 | 272 | SV-BC | Out-of-date summary of assignment pattern rules in 8.13.2 | fixed | 0 | 1-Abs | Steven abstained for lack of sufficient time to study proposal, he'd just joined the meeting | Approval | Unanimous | |
| 649 | 253, 254 | SV-EC | (issue_253_254)cross coverage, coverpoint bins for default, igonred or illegal | fixed | 0 | 2:abs | Francoise and Steven, no knowledge of coverage | Approval | Unanimous | |
| 615 | 283 | SV-EC | Dynamic and associative arrays, and queues, can be multiDim (BNF) | fixed | 0 | 3 abs, one no | Abstain:
Ray (resizing multi-dimenaionl rules need to be looked into). Francoise, Steven, opposed: Cliff (vote no, So all can digest it till Monday). |
Approval | Dave Brad Neil Surre | Need to reword first sentence of 5.6: One or dimensions of an array or queue can be dynamic... Add 2 dimensional example. Brad to take action to bring it up with SV=BC |
| 432 | 93 | SV-CC | 29.5.2 Don't understand note at the end | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Send it back to update attached file | Unanimous | 4/16 ammendment is updated--KLP | |
| 422 | 87 | SV-CC | 29.1.1 should be removed | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Send it back to update attached file | Unanimous | Friendly ammendment needs to be in the proposal | |
| 433 | 94 | SV-CC | 30 - incorrect title | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Send it back to update attached file | Unanimous | Friendly ammendment needs to be in the proposal | |
| 624 | 245 | SV-BC | upward defparam and arrayed interface port | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Send it back to reword | Brad votes against | Wording is not clear to the champions | |
| 585 | ?? | SV-CC | 31.8.6 font issue | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Send it back for update | Unanimous | The proposal is now updated 4/16 -- KLP | |
| 586 | ?? | SV-CC | 31.8.7 sentence need clarification | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Send it back for update | Unanimous | The proposal is now updated 4/16 -- KLP | |
| 415 | ?? | V-PTF | 26.6.3 improperly drawn diagram - regression | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Send it back for proposal | Unanimous | ||
| 679 | 208 | Champion | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Discuss | ||||
| 644 | 229 | SV-EC | Structures type initialization and randomization Ballot Issue 229 | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | BC passed it back to the EC, EC unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | Has VPI impact. |
| 646 | 230 | SV-EC | procedural context ballot issue 230 | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | Watch that this takes precedence over cliff's note changes. | |
| 674 | 256 | SV-BC | Ballot Feedback Issue 256: P-1800 permits "parameter" to mean "localparam" within a | not a bug | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | Link is incorrect in the bug note | |
| 617 | 11 | SV-EC | Program can contain final blocks | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | Needs VPI enhancement for initial and final block access/processes | |
| 675 | 203 | SV-BC | Ballot Feedback Issue 203: Packed unions shall not be restricted to equal length item | not a bug | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | Neil & Stu believe they should have tried to get feedback from the entity | |
| 657 | ?? | V-1364 | resetall directive not allowed in module | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | Recommended friendly amendment: to change within a module declaration to within a module or udp declaration | |
| 336 | 6 | SV-BC | unions seem to allow some problematic members | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 352 | 157 | SV-CC | What all should vpiImport return? | not a bug | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 372 | 1364-8 | V-PTF | PTF 312: Need two new time related callbacks | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 385 | 122 | SV-CC | Incorrect DPI return type allowed in 28.4.5 | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 386 | 260 | SV-CC | Erroneous cross-reference in E.6.6 | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 406 | 199 | SV-CC | scalar bit and logic small values omitted from E.7.7 definition | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 407 | 123 | SV-CC | clarify support for enumeration base types (E.6.3) | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 408 | 128 | SV-AC | Section H.4.1: Typo in formal semantic definition of SVA | duplicate | 635 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 410 | 11 | SV-BC | Inconsistent wildcard treatment | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 413 | ?? | V-PTF | Need parens at end of routine call properties | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 414 | ?? | V-PTF | 26.6.42 'taskfunc' should be 'task func' | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 417 | ?? | V-PTF | PTF 311 Problem with loads in VPI | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 423 | 88 | SV-CC | 29.2 This section is no longer needed | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 427 | 90 | SV-CC | 29.3.2.2 should be removed | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 428 | 44 | SV-CC | 29.4.2 needs better whitespace | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 434 | 160 | SV-CC | 30.1.3 Last sentence is not clear | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 439 | 52 | SV-CC | Annex I - implied properties are really return values | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 440 | 99 | SV-CC | Annex I - vpiUserDefinedClass | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 443 | 133 | SV-CC | 32.2 The note needs to go in section 32.7 | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 444 | 134 | SV-CC | 32.3 & 32.6 Superfluous note should be removed | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 446 | 56 | SV-CC | 32.5 incorrect note | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 452 | 17 | SV-CC | 32.8 backwards compatibility broken here | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 453 | 60 | SV-CC | Several sections missing access by index properties | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 456 | 61 | SV-CC | 32.13 poorly drawn diagram - regression | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 457 | 62 | SV-CC | 32.13 LHS of bottom diagram incorrectly drawn | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 460 | 63 | SV-CC | 32.13 need parens at end of routine properties | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 461 | 141 | SV-CC | 32.30 indentation for properties is incorrect | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 462 | 142 | SV-CC | 32.14 vpiParent label is poorly placed | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 464 | 111 | SV-CC | 32.17 Please explain need for typespec member object | not a bug | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 466 | 66 | SV-CC | 32.20 'nets' should be 'scope' | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 467 | 67 | SV-CC | 32.21 extend or extends? | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 468 | 68 | SV-CC | 32.21 First note needs some work | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 469 | 69 | SV-CC | 32.21 Note 2 is a partial sentence | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 470 | 144 | SV-CC | 32.21 Properties should be with defn not ref | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 471 | 145 | SV-CC | 32.21 typo in note 6 | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 473 | 177 | SV-CC | 32.22 Note 3 needs work | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 474 | 116 | SV-CC | 32.22 remove notes 5 and 6 | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 475 | 117 | SV-CC | 32.23 property return values should be specified in include file | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 476 | 148 | SV-CC | 32.23 clarify vpiParent label | not a bug | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 477 | 72 | SV-CC | 32.25 missing newer changes from P1364 | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 478 | 179 | SV-CC | 32.26 property type is missing | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 479 | 73 | SV-CC | 32.26 'refobj' should be 'ref obj'. | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 488 | 78 | SV-CC | 32.38 vpiMemory should be removed | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 490 | 80 | SV-CC | 32.39 Indexed part select is missing | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 491 | 81 | SV-CC | 32.40 Missing null stmt definition | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 494 | 128 | SV-CC | 32.40 diffs here vs the include file | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 495 | 129 | SV-CC | 32.40, 32.41, and 32.42 all supersede P1364 26.6.27 | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 497 | 131 | SV-CC | 32.45 typespec reference should be a expr reference - regression | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 498 | 79 | SV-CC | 32.50 minor clarification needed here | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 500 | 87 | SV-CC | 32.47 Implies all expressions have a vpiName property | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 502 | 88 | SV-CC | 32.51 vpiExpr should apply to entire disables class | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 503 | 89 | SV-CC | 32.52 'return stmt' should be 'return' | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 504 | 90 | SV-CC | 32.53 Missing info from P1364 26.6.42 | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 509 | 20 | SV-AC | true/false definitions? | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 524 | 102 | SV-CC | 32.13 & 32.14 vpiArrayMember and vpiMember | duplicate | 382 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 525 | 158 | SV-CC | 32.13 grammatical error | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 527 | 159 | SV-CC | 32.14 grammatical error | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 530 | 104 | SV-CC | Annex E - Examples should use DPI-C label | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 531 | 139 | SV-CC | Annex I - no declaration of vpiUnboundedConst | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 533 | 82 | SV-CC | 32.22 vpiAccessType should be vpiVisibility | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 535 | 160 | SV-CC | 32.26 font size of note is inconsistent | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 537 | 109 | SV-EC | 12.2 - Can any kind of data_declaration can appear as a class_item? | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 540 | ?? | V-PTF | 26.1 inconsistency | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 542 | ?? | V-PTF | 26.2.4 inconsistency | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 550 | 161 | SV-EC | specparams allowed in program blocks | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 566 | 165 | SV-CC | 31.6 Why is there a double line between vpi_iterate() and vpi_handle()? | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 569 | 175 | SV-CC | 31.8.1 typos | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 574 | 179 | SV-CC | 31.8.3.2 Typo | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 582 | 181 | SV-CC | 31.8.4.2 grammar | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 591 | 118 | SV-CC | 31.11 vpi_get_time() is a void routine - backwards compatibility | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 598 | 200 | SV-CC | Clarify meaning of vpiClassDefn | duplicate | 473 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 599 | 201 | SV-CC | Clarify vpiActualDefn | duplicate | 473 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 600 | 202 | SV-CC | Confusing statement about vpiActualDefn | duplicate | 473 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 601 | 203 | SV-CC | class defn rather than "Class Defn" | duplicate | 473 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 602 | 204 | SV-CC | 32.26 "vpiVisibility" rather than "vpiAccess" for task and function declaration | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 603 | 196 | SV-CC | callee's declared the formals? | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 606 | 153 | SV-CC | 32.30 Problems with data model for clocking blocks | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 610 | ?? | SV-CC | 32.22 vpiFullName for data members? | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 612 | 274 | SV-CC | Don't allow packed bit vector return types as per Item 274 | duplicate | 385 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 613 | 123 | SV-CC | Clarify enumeration type support | duplicate | 407 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 614 | 7 | SV-BC | Better definition of compilation unit needed; better portability needed | open | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 616 | 237 | SV-EC | 'this' needn't be a qualifier | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 625 | 223 | SV-BC | Add data type to localparam | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 630 | 234 | SV-BC | always_comb static prefix does not include hierarchical references | open | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 631 | 231 | SV-BC | Equivalence of packed union types | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 632 | 244 | SV-BC | hierarchical references in interface ports can cause elaboration problems | open | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 633 | 242 | SV-BC | Wire declarations in packages -- no implicit assignments | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 635 | 128 | SV-AC | A typo in Annex H section 4.1 | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 636 | 250 | SV-EC | Clarification of covergroup 'strobe' option | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 637 | 240 | SV-EC | Transition bin incremented at most once per sample | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 638 | 270 | SV-EC | Syntax errors in constraint examples | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 639 | 271 | SV-EC | Default coverage goal | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 640 | 272 | SV-EC | kill() and supend() are void functions | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 642 | 236 | SV-EC | Evaluation of default argument values | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 643 | 251 | SV-EC | Covergroups in packages | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 651 | ?? | V-1364 | Cosmetic changes to example in 12.8.2 | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 652 | 232 | SV-EC | Conflict regarding lifetime of automatics | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 653 | 19 | V-1364 | timeskew and fullskew mixed in 15.3.3 | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 654 | ?? | V-1364 | Table 16.1 - RETAIN argument | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 655 | ?? | V-1364 | Table 16-2 note on nochange | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 656 | 22 | V-1364 | Table caption typo | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 659 | ?? | V-1364 | Continuation of table 17-5 | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 663 | 209 | SV-AC | Incorrect example in Section 18.7.3 (ballot commetnt #209) | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 664 | 213 | SV-AC | Missing semicolon in example in Section 18.13.1 (ballot comment #213) | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 665 | 214 | SV-AC | Incorrect example in Section 18.13.2 (ballot comment #214) | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 666 | 235 | SV-EC | disallow ref parameters for static subroutines | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 668 | 11 | SV-CC | 32.3 and 32.6 need process transition in response to mantis Item 617 | fixed | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 673 | 280 | SV-BC | Ballot Feedback Issue 280: Are literals with X/Z two-state? | not a bug | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 676 | 205 | SV-BC | Ballot Feedback Issue 205: Add support of unconstraint arrays | not a bug | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 677 | 264 | SV-BC | Ballot Feedback Issue 264: unique/priority violation should be errors | not a bug | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous | ||
| 678 | 207 | SV-BC | Ballot Feedback Issue 207: Variables shall be allowed for slicing vectors. | not a bug | 0 | Unanimous | Approval | Unanimous |