[sv-ac] RE: 1698 sampled value functions - review

From: Eduard Cerny <Eduard.Cerny_at_.....>
Date: Tue Jan 22 2008 - 11:30:09 PST
Hi Lisa, John,
 
I think that the proposal is ready  for  a vote. 
 
Still, I wonder about the following statement:
 
Since synthesized code executes in the active region, the past_variable
is used directly. Provided that

the model follows synthesis rules and is race-free, the behavior should
be equivalent to that in the original

model using $past. The other functions, $rose, $fell and $stable follow.

 

Can we really talk about "synthesis rules" Which ones? The LRM does not
introduce it. Similarly in the restrictions on always blocks, can we say


procedure that meets the requirements for modeling synthesizable
sequential logic behavior ?

Finally, "default clock" should be perhaps changed to "default
clocking".
 
Best regards,
ed


________________________________

	From: Lisa Piper [mailto:piper@cadence.com] 
	Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 10:22 AM
	To: Eduard Cerny
	Cc: sv-ac@eda.org
	Subject: 1698 sampled value functions
	
	

	<<1698_sampled_value_functions_08_1_22.pdf>> 

	

	Hi Ed,

	I have incorporated your suggestions.

	

	Lisa


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



Received on Tue Jan 22 11:37:04 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 22 2008 - 11:37:12 PST