Re: [sv-ac] unnecessary semicolon?

Subject: Re: [sv-ac] unnecessary semicolon?
From: Adam Krolnik (krolnik@lsil.com)
Date: Mon Nov 03 2003 - 13:57:22 PST

• Next message: Bassam Tabbara: "RE: [sv-ac] comments on Surrendra's corrections"
• Previous message: John Havlicek: "[sv-ac] unnecessary semicolon?"
• In reply to: John Havlicek: "[sv-ac] unnecessary semicolon?"
• Next in thread: Bassam Tabbara: "RE: [sv-ac] unnecessary semicolon?"
• Reply: Adam Krolnik: "Re: [sv-ac] unnecessary semicolon?"
• Reply: Bassam Tabbara: "RE: [sv-ac] unnecessary semicolon?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I'll vote for optional semicolons.

Precedence for the next standard...

    Adam

• Next message: Bassam Tabbara: "RE: [sv-ac] comments on Surrendra's corrections"
• Previous message: John Havlicek: "[sv-ac] unnecessary semicolon?"
• In reply to: John Havlicek: "[sv-ac] unnecessary semicolon?"
• Next in thread: Bassam Tabbara: "RE: [sv-ac] unnecessary semicolon?"
• Reply: Adam Krolnik: "Re: [sv-ac] unnecessary semicolon?"
• Reply: Bassam Tabbara: "RE: [sv-ac] unnecessary semicolon?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Nov 03 2003 - 13:58:05 PST