Subject: Re: New vote on SUAVE or Objective VHDL
From: Robert Klenke (rhklenke@vcu.edu)
Date: Mon Jun 26 2000 - 16:37:46 PDT
Folks,
John Michael Williams wrote:
[much other deleted]
>
> Let me amend my proposal: We vote as proposed. If a valid
> choice emerges for one of the two prototypes, then the
> requirements document for the choice will be reduced to a
> draft standards document (or part of one) for OO VHDL,
> and no further running code shall be presented to the group
> unless to prove contradiction(s) within the standard.
>
> --
> John
> jwill@pacbell.net
> John Michael Williams
I believe that in Peter's original message calling for a second vote
that the statement:
> When considering the question, please bear in mind that the selected
> proposal will serve as the starting point for the Working Group to
> develop a Trial Use standard.
mean exactly that, did it not? That's what I took it to mean.
Bob
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Klenke, Associate Professor Dept. of Electrical Engineering
School of Engineering
Phone: (804) 827-7007 601 West Main St., Room 222
Fax: (804) 828-4269 Virginia Commonwealth University
Email: rhklenke@vcu.EDU Richmond, VA 23284-3072
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Jun 26 2000 - 13:38:47 PDT