Reminder - Invitation meeting at DATE 2000
Subject: Reminder - Invitation meeting at DATE 2000
From: Wolfgang Nebel (Nebel@informatik.uni-oldenburg.de)
Date: Wed Mar 22 2000 - 04:00:14 PST
Reminder - Invitation meeting at DATE
2000
Dear all,
following the decision of the last meeting held at FDL, we will
convene at DATE 2000 in Paris on
March, 27th, 2000, 19:00 - 21:00 at the
Paris, France
Palais des Congres.
Room to be annouced at the venue.
For details on the location, hotels, DATE 2000, please see:
http://www.date-conference.com
At the last meeting agreement was found on the intended schedule
of the voting procedure:
Experts review outcome to be published Friday October 15th.
Discussion until Friday Oct. 29th.
Voting until Nov. 12th, 1999.
Since the consolidated report of the reviewers has not been
circulated yet, we are behind schedule. Hence the agenda of the
meeting has to be defined in short term dependent on the state of the
discussion. We should however, discuss the further procedure.
Just to remind you of the procedure we have agreed on up to now,
I append the proposed process again.
Best regards,
Wolfgang
Extract from the minutes of the DAC99 meeting of the group:
....
6. Process of Review of SUAVE and Objective VHDL
Proposals
PA presents the proposal to
review the proposals. A panel of three expert reviewers should be
installed and provided with documents:
Documents:
0. User Requirements Document
1. SUAVE Language Description
2. Objective VHDL Language Description
3. Language Comparison
4. Supplemental Material for SUAVE
tutorials, design case studies, tools, etc
5. Supplemental Material for Objective VHDL
tutorials, design case studies, tools,
etc
6. Critique of SUAVE by
Objective VHDL proposers
7. Critique of Objective VHDL by SUAVE proposers
The panel shall review the proposals w.r.t. the
following questions:
Questions:
Q0. How well does the proposal address the
user requirements identified
in Document 0?
Q1. Is the
proposal a strict superset of VHDL?
Q2. Is the proposal semantically
consistent with VHDL?
Q3. Is the proposal consistent with VHDL
syntax?
Q4. Is the proposal completely defined?
Schedule:
Nominations for panel members:
5pm
US-PDT Fri 2 Jul
Vote on panel members (if needed): 5pm US-PDT
Fri 9 Jul
Publication of Documents 1 to 5: 5pm
US-PDT Fri 9 Jul
Publication of Doc. 0 &
Critiques: 5pm US-PDT
Fri 6 Aug
Meeting (with FDL, Lyon, France): 9am-1pm,
Thu 2 Sep
Email vote on selection:
5pm
US-PDT Fri 24 Sep
WN suggests to count the votes
of DASC members separately from the votes of group members not being
DASC members.
The proposal has been accepted unanimously by vote of the
group.
....
________________________________________________________________________
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Wolfgang
Nebel
Tel.: +49-(0)441-798-4519
Carl v. Ossietzky
University Secretary: +49-(0)441-798-4517
FB
Informatik
Fax: +49-(0)441-798-2145
D-26111
Oldenburg Home:
+49-(0)441- 52826
Germany Mobile:
+49-(0)171-62 52827
e-mail: nebel@computer.org
or: nebel@informatik.uni-oldenburg.de
or: wnebel@ics.uci.edu
http://eis.informatik.uni-oldenburg.de
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Wolfgang
Nebel
Tel.: +49-(0)441-798-4519
Carl v. Ossietzky
University Secretary: +49-(0)441-798-4517
FB
Informatik
Fax: +49-(0)441-798-2145
D-26111
Oldenburg Home:
+49-(0)441- 52826
Germany Mobile:
+49-(0)171-62 52827
e-mail: nebel@computer.org
or: nebel@informatik.uni-oldenburg.de
or: wnebel@ics.uci.edu
http://eis.informatik.uni-oldenburg.de
________________________________________________________________________
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28
: Wed Mar 22 2000 - 04:10:50 PST