Subject: Re: e-mail discussion on review report
From: John Michael Williams (jwill@pacbell.net)
Date: Wed Mar 15 2000 - 10:29:24 PST
Hi All.
I for one would like it if we could get on with the
LANGUAGE specifications, and forget the tool conflict
until the requirements of the language have been agreed.
We seem to be oscillating between two prototypes--If
it keeps up, someone will come by with a third prototype,
and the entire process will have to be reset.
After deciding on the pending vote, I suggest all
reference to specific prototypes be dropped, and
use of running code be limited to DISPROOF of
consistency, only.
--
John
jwill@pacbell.net
John Michael Williams
>
> ...
> >What is not intended for low-level hardware synthesis is the abstract
> >communication and dynamic process features of SUAVE. These are oriented
> >towards high-level modeling and high-level synthesis.
>
> Can you point me to tools which are capable to handle this level?
> ...
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Mar 15 2000 - 10:34:19 PST