Re: Proposed PAR for trial use standard
M.M.Kamal Hashmi (kamal@wg.icl.co.uk)
Thu, 27 May 1999 14:37:19 +0100 (BST)
> From: "Peter J. Ashenden" <petera@cs.adelaide.edu.au>
> David Barton wrote:
> >
> > I have only one concern. Our original mandate from the DASC steering
> > committee is that we be able to draw a sharp distinction between the
> > OOVHDL effort and the SID group. I am not entirely sure this does
> > that; if so, we had better prepare a fairly clear argument for when we
> > present the PAR to the steering committee.
>
> Quite so. At FDL in Lausanne last year, we had a joint meeting of the
> OOVHDL and SID Chairs. We proposed that the SID group focus on language
> ...
Yep. For everyone's information, the minutes of the SID group's meeting
at FDL'98 contains the text of the SID-OO agreement in
http://www.eda.org/sid/mins3-fdl98.html
> ... We agreed that each group
> would keep track of what the other was doing and make sure we didn't act
> ...
And this is maintained by my participation in the OO group and Peter's
and Wolfram Putzke-Röming's participation in the SID group.
BTW, the SID group will meet at DAC.
- Kamal.