> The following comments forwarded from "Paul J. Menchini"
> <mench@mench.com>:
>>
>> Purpose
>>
>> Object-oriented and generic modeling offer better mechanisms for
>> ^^^^^^
>> [Than what? --PJM]
>>
>> abstraction and encapsulation of descriptions of designs and
>> testbenches, and thus provide enhanced potential for reuse. VHDL
>> currently lacks features for these styles of modeling, which are
>> ^
>> [Suggest "many", "a number of" or "a full set of" here. --PJM]
>>
>> important for managing the increasing complexity of design
>> descriptions.
>
> May I propose the following revision:
>
> Purpose
>
> Object-oriented and generic modeling offer mechanisms for
> abstraction and encapsulation of descriptions of designs and
> testbenches, and thus provide significant potential for reuse. VHDL
> currently lacks many features for these styles of modeling, which are
> important for managing the increasing complexity of design
> descriptions.
Looks good to me!
Thanks,
Paul
-- Paul Menchini | mench@mench.com |"The last thing I want to do is OrCAD | www.orcad.com | spread fear, uncertainty and doubt P.O. Box 71767 | 919-479-1670[v] | in the users' minds." Durham, NC 27722-1767 | 919-479-1671[f] | --Don Jones, MS's Y2K Product Mgr