Re: Issues List has been updated

Hi Erich,

Here are the priorities and disposition for issues 45-60. This represents
the opinions of Cindy, Dana, Sitvanit, and myself. For issue 51 we have two
opinions.

(45) LRM 5
(46) LRM 5
(47) ext. 2
(48) LRM 5
(49) need further clarification
(50) done
(51)
opinion 1: ext. 1 (the grammar should not be changed, and the example
should be changed to conform with the grammar)
opinion 2: LRM 5 (a simple grammar change should be made)
(52) LRM 5
(53) LRM 5
(54) ext. 3
(55) LRM 5
(56) ext. 3
(57) LRM 5
(58) LRM 2
(59) ext. 1
(60) LRM 5

Regards,
Avigail

_______________________________________________________
Avigail Orni
Verification and Testing Solutions Group
IBM Haifa Research Laboratory
Phone: 972-4-829-6396 email: ornia@il.ibm.com

                                                                           
             "Erich Marschner"
             <erichm@cadence.c
             om> To
             Sent by: <ieee-1850-issues@eda.org>
             owner-ieee-1850-e cc
             xtensions@eda.org <ieee-1850-extensions@eda.org>
                                                                   Subject
                                       Issues List has been updated
             10/01/2005 07:29
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           

Members of the Issues Subcommittee:

The Issues List on the IEEE 1850 PSL web page has been updated to reflect
(almost) all recent activity.

There are a number of "not yet dispositioned" issues, i.e., issues that
have not yet been assigned a priority and disposition. These are issues 45
through 60. Please review these issues and send me your opinion of their
priority (scale of 1(lowest) to 5 (highest), as before, with 0 meaning that
we should NOT address this issue) and their disposition (LRM, Extensions,
Out of Scope, Reject).

Note that many of these issues have already been grouped with others,
because they are closely related to issues we've already addressed. If you
object to any of the groupings, or would like to suggest other groupings,
please do.

Regards,

Erich
Received on Tue Jan 11 04:24:44 2005