Here are my priorities etc. for the remaining issues (37-50).
37. Expression Type Classes -- capitalization convention
Prio: 5
38. Parameters of more types should be supported.
Prio: 5
This is intimately connected to (albeit first level) property IP
reusage.
39. Clarify input sampling mechanism.
Prio: 5
40. Clocking of endpoints, prev etc.
Prio: 5
41. Generalization of forall (and forsome) to work on all "levels".
Prio: 5
42. Data-oriented coverage
I would need a more concrete proposal to say anything definite about
this. Certainly, I agree that data-oriented coverage support is
missing in PSL. However, how does this issue relate to forall on
directive level for instance, to enable things like
forall st in StateType : cover { state_reg = st };
Prio: ?
43. Transaction-oriented coverage
Prio: 0
44. SystemC flavor
Prio: 4
45. Clarify that time is discrete
LRM issue
Not sure if this is necessary...
Prio: 1
46. Clarify that time is context-independent
LRM issue
Prio: 1
47. Typed forall
Extension
Prio: 4
48. Clarify explanation of clock expressions
LRM
Prio: 3
49. Assertion Control Capability
Extension
Prio: 0
50. Parameterized AND/OR operators
Extension
I think the idea is OK, but that we certainly don't need both this
variant and forall, in case issue 41 is granted. It depends also on
what can be expressed with these new constructs in terms of
repetition range for instance (see also issue 47).
Prio: 0
Best regards,
Johan Alfredsson Mobile: +46 706 39 12 58
Product Manager Office: +46 31 745 19 00
Safelogic Fax: +46 31 745 19 39
Arvid Hedvalls Backe 4 johan.alfredsson@safelogic.se
411 33 Göteborg, Sweden www.safelogic.se
Received on Tue Nov 30 06:56:33 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 30 2004 - 06:56:34 PST