Subject: Re: Assertion Committee Meeting Minutes
From: Harry Foster (harry@verplex.com)
Date: Fri Mar 08 2002 - 13:37:57 PST
> Other point: Prakash's preference
> If the sequence is always evaluated immediately, you can just use (1;a;b)
to
> wait until next clock to look at 'a', with @@(posedge clk) always at the
> end. Using this convention, the @(posedge clk) is never needed before the
> sequence.
I like Prakash's suggestion. To me--simpler is always better. I hate
multiple ways of expressing the same thing......
-Harry
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Mar 08 2002 - 14:40:07 PST