Subject: RE: Thursday's Assertion Committee mtg
From: Harry Foster (harry@verplex.com)
Date: Wed Nov 14 2001 - 07:32:48 PST
One more thing--keep in mind that the assertion construct language
requirements are really only defined in section 4.1 (which is only 1.5
pages). Nothing else in the document that I sent out is a requirement.
Hence, I believe unless we want to open up these requirements to something
bigger--then we should be able to reach consensus on the simple assertion
construct.
Best regards,
-Harry
---------------------------------------------------------
Harry Foster Tel XXX-XXX-XXXX
Chief Architect Cell XXX-XXX-XXXX
Verplex Systems, Inc. mailto:harry@verplex.com
300 Montague Expwy, Suite 100 www.verplex.com
Milpitas, CA 95035 www.verifiableRTL.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Nov 14 2001 - 07:47:54 PST